Aug 162017
If the witnesses contradict each other regarding certain details, their testimony is still admissible but regarding other details it is not. Which details are those that are able to be contradicted and which are not? Is this the case both in monetary cases and in capital cases or only in monetary cases? At what point is it too late to bring further evidence? Can one side force the other to be judged in a larger court in another city?
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | RSS
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.