Jan 022017
The mishna’s cases about combined rental/borrowing situations are explained in 3 different ways according to varying opinions. Questions are asked regarding cases where one borrows an item “with the owner” and then before the rental time is up, he decides to rent it without the owner, Does the exemption of “with the owner” apply because the agreement is just continued from the original borrow or is it viewed as a new agreement? What about from renting to borrowing or from borrowing to renting to borrowing or vice versa.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | RSS
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.