Does the law that asmachta is not a valid sale apply only to land or also to moveable property? If someone is allows someone to take something of theirs without complaining (mechila) and later finds out that it was a mistake, is this valid or not? Does it depend on the situation? Cases are discussed regarding one who eats fruit off of property given to him as collateral – does it need to be returned or not (is it interest from the rabbis or from the Torah)? Does depend on the whether it is a place where the borrower can kick the lender off the property as soon as he pays back his loan or whether it is a place where the borrower does not have rights to kick the lender off his property until the time of the loan has ended. What other differences are there between land in the hands of the lender in each of these places?
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | RSS
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.